After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police,
(BUFDRVR) confessed the following:

Robey Price wrote:

Check here for a document titled "Statement of Intent"

Yep, so what?

So what? Who sarcastically asked,"What AF Form was this AF FORM LLC? I
can't figure out why guys make stuff up in newsgroups like this...?"

Answer...it wasn't made up.

I fail to see where he said (and you claimed he said) that
military flying was going to be a "life long commitment".

"gwb signed a statement of intent in 1968,
saying he planned to make flying in the TX ANG a life long commitment.
There is no evidence that he even attempted to fulfill that "promise."
He never said he lost interest, but his action sure did."

He specifically "intended" to finish his ADSC (which he did) and make *flying* a life long
comittment.

...."by serving as a memeber of the Air National Guard as long as
possible."

You left that part out.

So your beef with Lt. Bush was that he failed to get a civilian
rating or pursue the airlines? He certainly didn't do anything in that letter
that some how comitted him to do anything than serve his ADSC.

No my beef is a congressman's son, with a 1966 Disorderly Conduct
arrest for drunkenness (later dropped), scored the freakin' bare
minimum 25 on the pilot part of the AFOQT, got picked for a great gig
as a fighter pilot and flew only 22 months after becoming MR, then
lost interest. Simple. I'm ignoring the allegations that he was
snorting coke at the time and didn't even take his physical in August
resulting in his grounding.

The pedant will point out, traditional reservist do NOT have ADSC,
they have a MSO (military service obligation) see page 16 of 33 here
http://www.usatoday.com/news/bushdoc...ent_Packet.pdf

Yes. You claimed he was obligated to life long membership in the Air National
Guard because of this document, that has been shown to be false.

**** can't you read BD? My grief is that gwb lost interest after 22
months. He signed the letter that ends "by serving as a memeber of the
Air National Guard as long as possible."

Bottom Line: you challenged the veracity of my claim he signed some
bull**** letter...he did. You BD were left ****ing flat footed, now
arguing the semantics of things I didn't claim. You started off
arguing there was no letter...when confronted with the facts you now
argue what he meant by signing the letter.

Pitiful!