In article , Denyav
writes
Ouote:
"Democracy is inimical to IMPERIAL mobilization" page 35

Is it? Why?

If only 20 percent of population support your imperial mobilization plans a
system in which every vote counts is not very helpful for the realization of
your plans,I guess

Why 20%? Is that an arbitrary figure? Where are we talking about? 18th
century France? 20th century USSR?

o. You still don't make sense. There appear to be words missing.
Anyway, why shouldn't they have? It fitted in with the thinking of the
time.

Let me give you some hints,Brzezinski is a member of extremely influental CFR,
(Council on Foreign Relations).

I don't want hints, I want a sentence that is structured and
comprehensible. English is my primary language, and I find it helps
comprehension if it's written sensibly.

Does CFR really exist?
Or ,is it only a loudspeaker placed inside US and connected to the music
source located inside Great Britain?

More obscure thinking.


The
British settlers and their descendants were the major factor in founding
the USA, and stayed in the country. You leave, and, unless everybody has
learnt your language in the meantime, it goes with you as far as the
majority of the population is concerned.

Interesting,I guess Britons,Germans,French,Greeks,Arabs etc, were much dumber
than Indians,Zambians,Jamaicans etc.

No. The Empire educated the people, so they learnt English as they grew
up.

You know Romans ruled Britons,Germans and others for longer periods than
Britons ruled Indians.

But nobody speaks italian In UK,Germany,France ,Greece and Arab countries,but
almost everybody speaks English in former British colonies.

This is something to do with Roman "cultural appeal" and Anglo "Cultural
Assertiveness".

Romans were actually much more than Roman legions,they also represented
cultural highpoint of their era.

Confident cultures need not be assertive.period.

The cultural appeal can't have been that great then. You are wilfully
ignoring the question of education.

Empire and 16th-20th century India and USA. Nobody else in Europe has
Latin as their daily language either. Few people outside the clergy and
the upper classes spoke Latin, just like now.

Nobody in Europa speaks Italian either (except Italians of course)
Truth is Romans were not culturally assertive,they did not try to force any
body in empire to use their language.

What has Italian got to do with it? The Romans didn't speak it.

Oh yes it was. History is more or less accidental where the majority of
events is concerned.

Only,if you call sexual preferences of British foreign officers that helped to
create the Empire accidental .

Hardly relevant, even if it's true, which I doubt. Your prejudices are
showing again.

sake. Why did the Allies spend so much time, money and effort, lose so
many lives and endure such suffering to rid the world of him? To make
Henry Ford rich? You've been

In order to thrust Germany into a premature war,of course.

So the British Army occupied the Saar, concluded the Anschluss, occupied
Czechoslovakia and invaded Poland?

Let's look at that again: the Allies (even before they were the Allies)
conspired to put the NSDAP into power in Germany, forced Germany to make
war on the rest of Europe, and then spent six years undoing that work?
Gotta get some of what you're smoking, it's powerful stuff.

A war with Germany,armed with nuclear tipped ICBMs and other exotic stuff,would
be much more bloodier and even harder,if not impossible,to win

What?

Henry Ford rich? You've been reading too many thrillers.

Who needs thrillers,their authors cannot even imagine whats really happening in
real world.

And you do know what's happening? How?


nd you still haven't told me what an "Anglo" is.
--

Does it matter?
Since the first Homosapiens appeared in African continent?

Of course it matters! You're the one who is telling us all that we're
subject to an "Anglo" conspiracy. You might do us the courtesy of
letting everyone know exactly who they're up against.
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!