View Single Post
  #253  
Old March 1st 04, 02:45 AM
Tank Fixer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:04:20 GMT,
Chad Irby attempted to say .....

In article ,
"Doug \"Woody\" and Erin Beal" wrote:

On 2/22/04 5:18 PM, in article
,
"R. David Steele" wrote:


China has let it be known, there
are a number of papers coming out of their post graduate officers
school, that they plan to challenge us for control of the far
east. That means control over India, most of SE Asia (down to
Australia), Japan, the Philippines and Siberia.


Papers out of PG schools and war colleges are strictly academic
exercises--on both sides. Contingency plans are, well... contingencies.


Yeah, but suddenly deciding to build up to four aircraft carriers on a
rush program is a bit, well, *interesting*...


They won't have operational CV's and airwings for 20 years. And the PRC
won't last that long so it wont matter.


Especially after they decided to buy some Su-30s. Kinda makes you
wonder if they really bought the naval variant, plan on doing the mods
themselves, or have a naval version of their own somewhere.






--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.