(Issac Goldberg) wrote in message . com...
(Mike Weeks) wrote in message ...
From: (Theodore Herzl)
Date: 6/29/2004 17:26 Pacific Daylight Time

It seems rather reasonable
to investigate anew the events surrounding the USS Liberty attack in
public investigation that settles this once and for all.

The challenge for the conspiracy loons

Weeks knows all, sees all. Since he is omniscient, anyone
who disagrees with him is a 'conspiracy loon.' QED

He is also not very bright if he believes that tactic works. Try to
get him to explain what motivates him to work so hard to block an
investigation that he believes will prove himself and Cristol correct.
What does Weeks fear?

running around on the net is to actually
produce anything which can be considered credible.

So, according to Weeks:

1) the crew members of the USS Liberty are not credible,

Weeks believes he knows more than those who witnessed first hand the
events of that day.

2) Captain Boston is not credible,

Of course not, he was only the captain of the ship that was attacked
and lived through the whole thing, while Mike Weeks was probably still
playing with Tonka trucks at the time.

3) Secretary of State Rusk is not credible,

Of course not, being in the Presidents cabinet and privy to top secret
information is not as good as being Cristol cabin boy.

4) CIA director Helms is not credible,

Of course not, why would anyone think that the CIA directory would be
better informed than Mike Weeks. Just look at Week's qualification
listed below.

1. His name is Mike Weeks.
2. He has watched every episode of MASH
END


and the list goes on and on. Weeks is always right,
everybody else is always wrong.

He is a legend in his own mind.

Instead what we continue to
see is simply hot stale air.

All of the hot stale air is being produced
by Weeks. This is demonstrated by his
repeated need to resort to name calling.
If he had a valid argument, there would
be no need to engage in name calling.

Name calling is a typical Zionist tactic. A very predictable one at
that.

Oh, BTW clueless, what's available to be investigated is indeed public,

A nice tautology. It's the material which is not public which
should be investigated. Why, after 37 years, is so much
information about the attack on the Liberty still classified
by the US and Israeli governments?

and the
last really solid piece of material came out of the NSA in July 2003 and State
Dept. in Jan. 2004, and once again as in the other examples, it doesn't support
the claims of the conspiracy loons.

We'll just have to take Weeks word for it, since he doesn't tell
use exactly what the 'really solid' material is. This is natural
for Weeks, since he sees all, knows all. Weeks is omniscient,
and he does not need to provide any evidence. Weeks just knows.

Besides, all we hear from the nuts ...

Anyone who disagrees with Weeks is a nut.

When you have nothing to say, insult your opponent. Zionist
indoctination manual page 235.

Remaining nonsense snipped.

It is Weeks' arguments that are nonsense. He is so extreme
in his opposition to an honest investigation that one must
ask why? If the attack was truly an accident, an honest
independent investigation would confirm what Weeks says.
But he opposes a new investigation with every ounce of
energy he possesses. Why?

It is pretty obvious to me that a cover-up occured and that Israel
intentionally attacked the USS Liberty to bring the US into the
Israeli side in the 1967 war against Egypt. I believe Israel inteded
to sieze the Sinai settlements from Egypt and needed US support to
counter Soviet support for Egypt. To that end, like the Lavon Affair,
they needed to frame Egypt to get the US on thier side. When after
repeaded attacks they could not sink the ship or kill all the US
servicemen aboard the Liberty, they were forced to stop the attack and
begin the coverup. That cover-up continues today and I believe that
Mike Weeks opposition to a public investigation demonstrates only that
he would sell out the United States at the drop of a nickel for the
Israeli regime.