Thread
:
Mfg Data Plate Question
View Single Post
#
5
November 2nd 03, 07:37 PM
Jim Weir
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
(JDupre5762)
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:
-Not quite. This was the subject of discussion at the IA renewal clinic last
-year. The FAA could care less if it is there or not. The DEA is the one
-with
-the regulation and the FAA can not and will not enforce DEA regulation. Just
-ike FAA can not and will not enforce FCC (old radios) regulations.
-
-Then why is the regulation requiring an external data plate a part of the FAR
-45 rule? Maybe your FSDO doesn't want to enforce it but mine will. The
-impetus for the rule came from the DEA and Customs but the rule is the FAAs
and
-in the New England region they made real sure that we were all complying with
-it back in the '80s when it came out.
The part 45 rule said that for aircraft certificated after 1988 (which damned
few GA aircraft are) the required data plate had to be in one of two
places...external near the rearmost door OR by the tailfeathers. For those
aircraft certificated prior to this, it could be either INTERNAL or EXTERNAL at
the option of the person/company doing the certification.
Having said that, any aircraft with a legal manufacturer's data plate on the
aircraft does NOT NEED a second data plate back by the tailfeathers. I just
reread part 45, and nowhere does it demand a second data plate. Your FSDO may
be exerting their fifedom above and beyond the law, but there is no FAA
requirement for the second data plate.
Jim
Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com
Jim Weir