View Single Post
  #8  
Old March 27th 04, 04:03 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:35:32 -0500, "Gene Kearns"
wrote:


Here is the train of thought.....

Example, Lycoming engine (Continental is similar):

FAR 43.13(a)
Lycoming SSP-399 Page 1
Lycoming SI 1191


I like it, but...

43.13(a) is a catch-all reg, kinda like conduct unbecoming for a
pilot. BTW, does it mention "inspection"?

Lycoming may consider all it's publications mandatory/regulatory, but
I'm afraid in reality, the FAA does not, unless you are operating Pt
135 (ref 135.421 if memory serves).

TC