View Single Post
  #7  
Old May 11th 04, 04:22 PM
Jim Burns
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Haven't heard anything about it. Sounds ridiculous. (and I have to respond
just so nobody thinks that I actually posted something so bizzare.)
Jim Burns

"Jim B" wrote in message
...
How will the newly proposed law regarding the very detailed inspections
of planes older than 25 years affect our flying? It seems that having to
tear
them down to that extent and perform those inspections on the spars on
the wings and the tail surfaces is going to be very expensive. Also having
to scrap airframes after 15,000 hours just is a waste. Many airplanes
are still in very good condition at this time. I've heard this is being
pushed
heavily by the new airplane manufactures.

Jim