"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Kyle Boatright wrote:

"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...

You really don't understand, do you John? The process to approve this
part is NOT a simple 337. A 337 means you have approved data to make
the
modification.

Oh, no, sir. You submit a request to the local FSDO inspector, who
transfers it to regional engineering, who passes it on to Oklahoma
City,
who bucks it up the ladder to Washington DC for a policy decision,
while
you wait, and wait, and wait for an answer.

This is a frikkin' low horsepower single engine airplane out of the
1930s. If the valve the person is suggesting that they use is available
at the local hardware store, it is far superior to ANYTHING that was
available in the middle of the last century.

Put the sumbitch on and keep your mouth shut.

Jim



You're a bad person.

But I totally agree. ;-)

The only way you get busted is if: A) The airplane crashes because the
valve failed and B) You open your mouth.

Actually, a crash for any reason is bad if it results in the uncovering
of
the unapproved part.

Matt

Especially for the widow, and what little if anything will be left of the
estate once a lawyer finds out about the automotive valve.

It always amazes me how people insist on taking a chance on having a
lawyer
walk away with your life's savings and assets just because they're too
damn
lazy to track down the right part...

Juan

Are you totally clueless? Have you never heard of proximate cause as a
condition precedent to getting into court on a personal injury or wrongful
death lawsuit?