Sydney Hoeltzli wrote in message ...
Captain Wubba wrote:

Sydney, it's simply reality.

Wubba, despite my tender concern for inducing pac player's
migraines (duly reported on his medical application, no doubt *g*)
I decided I had to answer this.

Many things are and have been "reality", which are not morally,
ethically, or rationally defensible.

Do you truly find it persuasive that one should not argue
against something which falls into one or more of these
indefensible categories, simply because it is current "reality"? snip good stuff

Sydney, an excellent post. You dids left out nothin' ;-) No
sarcasm, no emotionalism; all things considered a very well reasoned
perspective. Although I also like certain elements of Captain Wubba's
position, I must agree especially with your assertion that the
existence of TFR's are not "rationally" disseminated. Thank you, my
migraine has gone away.

Cheers,

pacplyer