"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...

Why would it say anything of non-movement areas? It DOES NOT APPLY to
non-movement areas.


I didn't bring up non-movement areas, you did.



I taxi all the time in the non-movement areas at my home airport, as well
as
any number of other airports. The pavement I am taxiing on is a taxiway,
but because it's a non-movement area 91.129(i) doesn't apply.


What do you base that on? The regulation says "runway or taxiway", it
doesn't say "runway or taxiway, except those designated as non-movement
areas".



Your assertion is that I am in violation of 91.129(i) every time I do
this?


Read the regulation, it's not complicated.



I realize that you love to argue just for the sake of the troll, but this
time you are really off the deep end.


You're an extremely poor judge of character.



The situation at Renton sounds
screwed up, to be sure, but if they want to classify the entire airport
except the runway as a non-movement area, then no ATC clearance is
required
to taxi around the airport (except on the runway of course).


FAR 91.129(i) says differently. I wouldn't get too excited about it, some
regulations are violated regularly without consequence.