Formally declare war first. And you still have to prove (!) the arguments
for invading another (sic) country. None of the "arguments" survived.
Well,
guess we have a liar somewhere ... and we have many people believing a
liar.

Martin, let's, for the moment, assume that *everything* President Bush and
Tony Blair have said was a lie. There were no weapons of mass destruction.
No abuse of the Iraqi people. No threats to his neighbors. None of it.

(Of course, you have to ignore 30 years of historic fact to get to this
position, but that hasn't seemed to deter you.)

So, what have we got left? We've STILL got a despot (Saddam) who had
achieved control of a "country" (that was created by the British. It can be
argued that "Iraq" was -- and still is -- a convenient machination of the
western powers.) through illegal means, that has since been removed from
power by the very countries (Britain and the U.S.) that created him -- AND
Iraq -- in the first place.

This is what's known as "justice", and you might want to get a grip on that
fact before you pop a blood vessel.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"