Bob, you must have known my flight instructor. I started my flight
training in warriors in 1984 in Ocean City, NJ. I think they widened
the runway since then. There was almost always a healthy crosswind.
Landings were full flaps just as you describe. Crosswind technique
was crab, then slip and land on the upwind wheel, with full flaps.
Third notch after established on final. I never understood why in a
crosswind people want to go faster. I guess it's whatever you're
comfortable with. Despite my best efforts, I'm still a renter and I
always try to land as slow as safely possible to help wear and tear on
the tired old birds I fly.
Dave
"Bob Gardner" wrote in message news:2mW_a.145947$o%2.62355@sccrnsc02...
Well, I've graduated a lot of students over the years, and to the best of my
knowledge none of them has ever had a landing accident. Normal landings are
full-flap landings, even in a crosswind...minimum touchdown speed is the
key, with anti-xwind controls. Page 5-24 of my Warrior book ("Landing
Performance") is predicated on full flaps, power off, and max braking. The
chart is NOT labeled "short field landing." Page 4-14, under normal
procedures for approach and landing, hedges a bit...still calls for full
flaps and 63, but allows as how enough power should be carried to maintain
the desired speed and approach path (no argument there). No mention of
crosswind technique, but when Boeing Field had a 60 degree xwind at 15-20
knots or so I would call my students and say "Come on down....we're gonna do
some full-flap crosswind landings."

You can do lots of things in a low-wing airplane that would be questionable
in a high-wing airplane.

Did I mention that I was an examiner when I worked at the Piper FBO?

Bob Gardner