"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
k.net...

"Steve House" wrote in message
...

You are arbitraily choosing a very narrow definition of the word
"marriage"
and then asserting that your definition is absolute and universal,
somehow
derived from natural law analogous to the impossibility of division by
zero
or the creation of perpetual motion machines.


Actually, I'm not defining anything at all, it's you that is trying to
redefine marriage.
l


Yes, of course. And since it's a human invention it can be reinvented as
needed. Replacing a definition that is needlessly harmful to certain
members of society with one that is more humane and enhances the personal
liberty of everyone.