"Peter Duniho" wrote:

[...] I simply think it goes too far to assume a
violation and wish a visit by a tax man on a fellow pilot.

I simply think it goes too far to assume a comment was directed at a person
that the comment specifically excluded.

I gave a list of reasons why they didn't have to pay taxes
on their aircraft. You took that list, and without any
basis, questioned the pilots' veracity, then wished the tax
man on them.

The list I gave was for comparison with the RI law.
Although this thread started as an attack on the R.I law,
when you realize that their law excludes non-residents, and
then compare to the CT law, you see that RI is actually
easier on its residents, as they can still fly into their
home state without triggering the use tax.

But even if I wished a visit by a tax man on the people you're talking
about, so what? According to you, they have nothing to hide, and have
broken no laws. They should breeze right through the audit.

Sounds like you've never dealt with the tax man before.

Todd Pattist
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)
___
Make a commitment to learn something from every flight.
Share what you learn.