Steve Dold wrote in message ...
On 17 Sep 2003, Snowbird wrote:
Since when does a C152 need to be steered with the brakes?

I keep reading this and wonder how many people here actually fly
these things. It's common at small airports to be faced with a turn that
can't be made with nosewheel steering alone, and you need to use
differential braking. It's not always poor planning, sometimes it just
works out that way.

I fly a plane (Grumman Tiger) which steers exclusively with
differential
braking. It can turn on a dime and give change. I utilize maximum
rudder deflection first, then braking as needed. We need to replace
brake pads
every few hundred hours, in contrast to some Grumman owners who
replace
much more frequently (and either need to clean their brake system
and de-gum the wheel cylinder or start using rudder).

However, prior to 'going rivetless' I had a couple of hundred hours
kicking around the country in various Cessnas and Pipers, and I
certainly never found an airport which required brakes to taxi
if the flight controls were in the right place for wind. OK, I
take that back. There was one flight with a Crosswind from Hell
where I found myself using taps on the brake to taxi straight,
but I bet now that I'm more clueful about rudder I coulda done
w/out brake. I do remember using brake to turn into a tight space
(as when parking -- something that makes me wince now to watch
as so many Cessna pilots seem to stand on the brake and gun the
poor engine).

But normal taxiing ops? Can't says I ever encountered an airport
where brakes were necessary. So I just can't agree that it's
"common at small airports to be faced with a turn that can't
be made with nosewheel steering alone" in a small Cessna.

Got a few examples of such turns at specific airports you'd
like to share?

Curious Sydney