"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

To what report are you referring?


The one that followed your statement "Here's the FAA preliminary report on
the accident that occurred at Montgomery:"



And regardless, I'd prefer that you made your point rather than
forcing me to infer it.


I'm not trying to make a point, I'm trying to understand the point you were
apparently trying to make.

You wrote; "With visibility at 1/4 mile around the time of the accident, I
would
suspect that the tower controller would not have approved an instrument
approach." But the approach is not subject to the tower controller's
approval. You then wrote; "True. I should have said, cleared the flight to
land." But the report you posted contained nothing that suggested any basis
upon which to deny a landing clearance.