On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:29:19 -0700, "Tom S." wrote
in Message-Id: :


So someone else has to provide the means AND can't set the rules under which
that ASSOCIATION constines to exist?

Not of the rules she sets violate the prevailing law. There's a
technical term for such an individual: criminal.

[...]

A company is run for the OWNERS, not for the EMPLOYEES. Having good
relations with employees is a good idea, but NOT having good relations IS
NOT slavery.

And failing to pay employees for their labor is actionable in most
states.