Thread: JFK
View Single Post
  #222  
Old November 18th 03, 12:08 AM
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rachel Carlson"
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 10:05 PM
Subject: JFK






Takes action myass. He wanted this war for oil and business.


Huh? We don't need to go to Iraq to get oil. Are you saying that we went

to
Afghanistan "for oil" too?


No. We went to Afghanistan to get Osama. We went to Iraq because we didn't.

He doesn't give
a flying fig about the Iraqi people.


His actions show otherwise.


How. By bombing the crap out of them. How can he claim surgical strike
capability when he's dropping thousands of bombs a day.


The inspectors were going in. This war
is unnecessary.


The inspectors hadn't been in for over half a decade. Why did they

suddenly go
back?


Because Buhs had to divert attention from the fact that he couldn't get
Osama.

The threat of force was the ONLY reason Hussein was going to let them in
at all, even as he was hiding his programs.


See below.


The stern threat was probably necessary to get the
inspectors in,


It's obvious that they were not going anywhere without credible threat of

force,
because they didn't go anywhere without a credible threat of force.


Nor, evidently, were they going anywhere at all. Talk about unrestricted
access. Where are the WMD's and don't give me any crap about saving the F
ing Iraqis in your answer.



but once they were, Buhs had no reason to wage this war
beyond the almighty dollar. Even Rummy said that if we didn't find

weapons
in "x" months, which have long passed, we would have a credibility

problem.



Do tell us what x really is.


I believe x=6. I don't record every word these people say. I have better
things to do.


Speaking of credibility problem, you seem to have
no problem with Clinton's brutual bombing of Baghdad in 1998, the strikes

in
1995, the Belgrade calamities caused by bombing in 1999, the bloody

excursions
in Haiti, Somalia, Bosnia. But whenever there was terrorism (World Trade
Center bombing 1993, Cole Bombing, US Embassy bombings, and so on), there

was no
response except the message that America will not respond.


And you do seem to have a problem with them. Why is it that anything Clinton
did was impeachable, but Buhs can do no wrong?

And we do-except for those who refuse to face reality.


Don't take my word, Click here to hear Clinton say it in his own words:
http://tinyurl.com/67rz (small audio file)


Seems Bill was wrong here. Even with nobody watching, he never rebuilt his
arsenal, did he?