You obviously don't recognize sarcasm when you read it.

I'll explain for you and I'll try to use small words.

Bob's statement was a desperate, yet feeble attempt to take a simple
statement about a specific set of circumstances and turn it into a
generalization. (That means he thinks I feel that way about all situations
in all circumstances-ok?) Since it made no logical sense at all, and I
realized that said statement was not worth rebutting, I wrote the response
you see. It's the same thing you are trying to do
with your response.

So if I write "Yeah Jeff. That's what I think," will you now understand that
I really don't think that at all, or should I explain it some more for you?

Do you get it now?

Jeez...

mike regish

"Jeffrey Voight" wrote in message
...
So, the U.N. was totally wrong in threatening .mil action? I suppose
that parents shouldn't discipline children and criminals are simply
misunderstood.

Jeff...

mike regish wrote:
Yeah, Bob. That would be the logical conclusion from that statement.

mike regish

"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...

In article IZlAb.316634$ao4.1071509@attbi_s51, "mike regish"
wrote:


Certainly more than the time Bush allowed. Frankly, I would have
preferred
to have a permanent team of inspectors stationed there than rushing to
war.

So, in your mind, war can never be justified.

--
Bob Noel