Andrew Gideon wrote in
online.com:

If you're not getting a "bounce" there's something wrong with how
you're sending the email. Well...actually, that's less true today.
I'll explain why.

That would have been true four or five years ago. Not now. These days
VERY FEW of recipient ISP's or major companies bounce blacklisted
e:mail. It serves essentially no value except to double the load on the
internet. Spammers virtually never have their own "reply to" or "from"
address, so any bounce will go to either an invalid address or (these
days) more likely to someone whose address was harvested at random.

Spam that is not blacklisted but has an invalid recipient address is
still universally bounced. We get a few hundred per day of "Your mail
could not be delivered..." messages - all for mail we never sent.

I have also observed that most users have little idea what filtering
(blacklist or otherwise) is automatically imposed by their ISP. Often
even the bulk of the people at the ISP may not know. Thus we have the
situation where mail is sent... and simply never arrives. Tracking down
the point where it disappears can sometimes be a significant hassle.

Royal pain, and a cure as bad or worse than the disease.

It is a pain, but most people disagree with your assessment.

Tell that to my customers who are losing money when documentation
packages or other important materials are not arriving... because their
ISP is dropping selections of their e:mail without telling either them
or the sender.

I have absolutely no problem with ISP's providing anti-spam software.
But I would say there are two absolutely mandatory requirements:
1) They **must** tell their customers that they are doing it.
2) The customers should be able to "opt out" if necessary to insure the
proper receipt of necessary e:mail.

[BTW, another interesting problem with one ISP that took us a LONG time
to get fixed. That ISP had, among other unpublished anti-spam features,
software that would designate as spam anything where a number of users
received the same e:mail from the same sender within a short period of
time. Unfortunately, the number seemed to be about SIX!

Guess what would happen when certain aviation e:newsletters would send
out their weekly update! Yup... dropped!!! With no indication to the
end user, and not even tech support knew they were doing it.]


-----------------------------------------------
James M. Knox
TriSoft ph 512-385-0316
1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331
Austin, Tx 78721
-----------------------------------------------