In article , Cub Driver
writes:


They may be able to require that the modifications are performed to certain
standards if you wish to overfly populated areas, but the second amendment
is
pretty clear.

Actually, the Supreme Court reads it rather differently than you do.



SCOTUS has not ruled on the 2nd since the Miller case over 70 years ago. At the
time, they ruled that a sawed off shotgun was not protected by the 2nd
amendment *because it was not a militarily useful weapon.*

The implication of the only direct ruling on the 2nd is that the right of the
people to keep and bear arms relates specifically to militarily useful weapons.

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG