On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:50:12 -0600 "Matthew P. Cummings" wrote:

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:00:24 -0800, R. Hubbell wrote:

You've snipped it out. I don't have the time to search for it. If I remember
the context, it was a silly thing to expect from the AOPA. Enough said.

Do you think it was silly of AOPA to develop the airport security program?
Doesn't matter, they did. Now when something isn't working in it and
it's brought to their attention they ignore it.

You don't seem to grasp the fact that when their program failed they are
not interested in why so that they can improve it before the govt.
improves it. Maybe you want the govt. to improve the plan then? That's
what's going to happen if AOPA keeps ignoring it.

I don't care if you are lazy, you should read a posting before replying to
it, or are you just trying ignorant?



I did read the posting, in a perfect world all the things we think should
happen, would happen. Keep supporting the AOPA, don't get too discouraged
if you feel they have failed you in some way. I don't think they have.

(notice I included your posting)


R. Hubbell