In article ,
Cub Driver wrote:

If there had been a policy of active resistance to hijackers, 9/11 would
never have happened, as the goons would never have gotten to the cockpit.

This is no doubt true, but it likely would have led to unnecessary
deaths. Until 9/11, hijackers weren't interested in killing
themselves, but had other agendas. So I think that the pre 9/11
protocol was the correct one.


No, I don't think so! If only one of the pre-911 hijackers had
encountered a splitting headache, the whole hijacking nonsense from ca
1965 on would have stopped cold. It was the policy of acquiesense that
emboldened the 9/11 hijackers. Had they known that the penalty for
storming the flight deck was sudden death, the problem would never have
occurred.




I also think that most of the changes following 9/11 were also
correct, including the use of armed sky marshals.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com