View Single Post
  #10  
Old January 8th 04, 04:37 PM
Paul Sengupta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in message
...
It really
seems to have worked like a charm in the UK where soon after banning
firearms alltogether, gun related crimes went sky-high.


I don't know why people from the US persist in this belief.

I refer to my posts
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L22C42007
and
http://makeashorterlink.com/?I3AC21007
and
http://makeashorterlink.com/?E6EB52007

Gun crime has risen sharply over the past couple of years. Nothing
to do with banning handguns as people have never kept handguns
for protection like in the US. Gun club members could keep them
at home (locked away), after 1997 they can't, they have to keep
them locked at the club. In either case, these were for competition
use only, and as such, licenses were only given for such use.

The ban on keeping handguns at home only ever affected the
sporting gun owner. All it did was prevent such a person from
"going postal". It had no effect on the protection of individuals,
one way or the other.

As pointed out, gun crime only really affects those "in or related to
the business". The general population can go about their business
without even thinking that anyone else has a gun. Before or after.

You have to realise that the way of life is different over here.

Paul