In article ,
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote:

Jonathan Goodish wrote:

Reasonable security would include ....

A whole bunch of things that are wildly UNreasonable, expensive, and useless.


How so? I guess my experience with theft and vandalism at local fields
must have been my imagination.

Quite the contrary, my suggestions are quite reasonable, not expensive
(except for the surveillence), and far from useless. If you don't agree
then I expect you to suggest alternatives for securing these fields. "A
bunch of guys who've been hanging out there since WWII" isn't an
acceptable answer.



JKG