"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
. ..
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
More drivel. The only thing that a builder is afforded over anyone
else
who owns a homebuilt is eligibility to sign off the annuals.
Of course, that from Natalie, who doesn't even know a homebuilt is an
experimantal.
If you build it to sell, you are outside the regulatory intent of a
homebuilt.
I very much know it is certificated in "Experimental
You wrote that you didn't know that, not very long ago.
Are you now claiming that I am correct and you have no businees discussing
regulatory issues, Natalie?
-- Amateur Built." The
only thing the rules say is that it must be CONSTRUCTED FOR EDUCATION
OR RECREATION. It doesn't say anything about what it is used for
afterwards.
There is no restriction on selling homebuilts or maintaining and operating
them after
they are sold.
There are several regulatory differences between homebuilts WRT
maintainance. As to building a homebuilt to sell, that alone invalidates
all that AEA has done. A DAS is required to build kit airplanes and sell
them.
Perhaps you would like to post up one of the archive trolls and remove any
doubt of your idiot status, Nesbitt?
|