"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"John Gaquin" wrote:
Very few people in Washington who are not Very High Profile
dare seriously cross swords with the Clintons. There are well
over a hundred people associated with the Clintons over the
past twenty-five years who have done so, and subsequently
died in violent or questionable circumstances.

I personally dislike the Clintons, John, but I just can't let this pass
unchallenged: are you seriously contending that they are complicit in
mass murder, and that many people in Washington fear to criticize them
for this reason?

Complicit, or circumstantial?

It could be that they merely run with a dangerous crowd. That crowd, to
protect it's base, could infer a complicity that isn't really present.

On the other hand, a bunch of presents under the tree on Christmas morning
IMPLIES Santa Claus, but ....

Recall that in the entire history of gangland murder, prosecutors were never
able to directly pin a murder to an order of the mob bosses. They know how
to avoid such blatant directness.