Huh,

I was under the impression that the GPS signals are fairly weak and
intentional interference is a serious issue.
Is that not correct?

Can you provide some sources for your statements?

thanks

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Peter" wrote in message
news:ruUYb.349212$xy6.1742195@attbi_s02...
Ron Lee wrote:
"Dave" wrote:


Unaugmented GPS is accurate to within 7.2 meters longitudinally.


Go say that in sci.geo.satellite-nav and see what happens.



Probably not a bad number.

Only if the usual caveats are added; i.e. 95% of the time and assuming
the
receiver has good reception conditions. Any attorney trying to
discredit
GPS evidence will naturally focus on the 5% of the time when the
position
could be off by more than the nominal accuracy and on obstructions,
multi-path reflections, RFI, etc. that can degrade performance,
particularly in a covert installation where the antenna is unlikely to
be
optimally placed for good reception.

False.

The convergence of the GPS Jacobian does not occur for the conditions you
describe. One of the major advantages of GPS over current ground based
navigation is the difficulty of spoofing the system.