View Single Post
  #6  
Old February 23rd 04, 01:48 PM
Stealth Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:19:52 -0800, "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message
.. .
never hinted that it was immune from anything.


True, you didn't hint at it. You just came right out and claimed it. Bob
wrote "the range for any aircraft is dependent on power setting", and you
wrote "my experience doesnt [sic] support that". When in fact the range for
any aircraft IS dependent on power setting.

Bob's statement was somewhat inaccurate in that 50% power may or may not
produce best range, and may not even be better range than normal cruise.
But it's impossible that your experience would contradict that the range is
dependent on power setting, because range DOES depend on power setting.


peter
the time, the duration, that an aircraft can remain airborne is
dependent on power setting. not necessarily the range achieved.

what I posted were some factual observations. dispute them if you
will, they still remain what I observed.
ymmv
Stealth Pilot
Australia