View Single Post
  #3  
Old May 18th 04, 11:28 PM
Dillon Pyron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:36:04 +0100, anonymous coward
wrote:

On Sun, 16 May 2004 23:35:57 +0000, nauga wrote:

anonymous coward wrote...

The sort of designs I had in mind were the LongEZ or Junqua IBIS...


There are clearly slow-speed pushers with ballistic chutes, as I
think you knew based on some stuff I snipped. On a Long-Eze I'd be
more concerned about canopy/shroud strength and maximum deployment
speed rather than prop fouling. I'd bet adding a chute to a
fast cruiser where it wasn't designed in from the start would
either add a significant amount of weight in terms of additional structure


I'd been wondering the same. On hang-gliders the parachute is
attached to the pilot and not to the aircraft, so provided the pilot can
stand the opening shock it doesn't matter what happens to the wing - I
wonder if the answer is to attach the bridle to the pilot's seat rather
than the airframe.



The Air Force and Navy do that. They call it an ejection seat. :-)


--
dillon

When I was a kid, I thought the angel's name was Hark
and the horse's name was Bob.