View Single Post
  #8  
Old March 30th 04, 12:56 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dude" wrote in message
...
The problem with contingency fees is not that they are a bad idea, it is
that they are abused. They are still necessary to assure equal

protection.

The Bar does not live up to its high calling to police its own. Instead,

it
handcuffs itself as if it had no care or concern for the good of anything

or
anyone other than lawyers. Lawyers should be held to a higher standard,

and
their licenses more easily revoked. If the Bars are going to maintain a
monopoly, they should be forced to do a better job. Unfortunately, all

the
legislatures and courts are full of Bar members, so don't hold your

breath.

Our judges are no longer empowered to be judges. They are too hamstrung

by
the legislature (who are rightly upset due to judicial activism). In my
opinion, a good judge should have more power to tell a lawyer to take his
ridiculous motions and suits and stick them where they belong.
Unfotunately, that is no longer the case in this country. Due to the
system's inability to weed out or remove bad judges, the whole thing has
gone haywire.

What we really need to figure out is how to get better judges and get rid

of
the bad ones.


Judges are all members of the ABA, too.