Thanks for turning me on to AIM 4-3-2; it doesn't get much clearer than
that.
Is it possible that Waukegan has some special stuff going on because the
center of the airport is only 2 nm from the Chicago Class B?
BTW: I'm not one of those "argument for argument's sake" dudes, I'm just
trying to make sure I learn and thoroughly understand this stuff. Thanks for
your help!
"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
...
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...
Let's first jump back to my original subject on the specifics of the
accident:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
------
You stated: "The accident was caused by both pilots not seeing and
avoiding."
However, the article states: "Student pilot Sharon Hock...was not
mentioned
as a factor in the Feb. 8, 2000, accident."
Further: "The probable cause of the accident was Collins' "failure to
maintain clearance from the other airplane," said the NTSB report, which
is
in line with a previous federal report outlining the facts of the
accident."
Additionally: ""Factors relating to the accident were the pilot's
Collins']
poor visual lookout, and the . . . local controller's failure to provide
effective sequencing,"
And: "Fowler (controller) said he told Hock to turn "based on his
estimate
of the elapsed time before losing sight of [her plane], and the pilot's
Collins) verbal report that he had crossed the shoreline.""
You stated: "It is a class D airport. Controllers are not responsible
for
separation or sequencing at class D airports. A fact seemingly lost to
many
pilots."
However, both the NTSB and the controller indicated that "separation and
sequencing" were part of the controller's responsibilities at Waukegan.
A lot of the findings go against FARs and what is written in the AIM. The
report doesn't make sense in a lot of areas. I can't explain or
understand
the government and quite honestly hope I never do.
Further: AIM 4-3-2 indicates that the tower at Class D airports will
provide
traffic control in the Class D airspace.
Give paragraph 3-2-5 a read. Very last sentence of that section.
|