"Mike Murdock" wrote in message
...
Cirrus says that they will eventually extend the life limit to 12,000
hours,
which means that instead of paying $70/hour just for the airframe, you
will
only be paying about $25. Still, Cirrus has not been able to get the
extension and they have been promising it for years.

Did someone from Cirrus promise this to you? No one promised it to me,
and
I've bought two SR22s from them.

The claim that the limit is based on the SR-20 is obviously bogus.

How so? Do you have any evidence to the contrary?

How does a 12,000 hour airframe life limit for the SR-20 translate to a
4,350 hour airframe limit for an SR-22? Do you or does anyone at Cirrus have
one shred of evidence to support that claim?


So is the claim that they are waiting for the G-2. What does that have
to
do with it?

Probably because the G2 is made with different fuselage molds, including a
different airfoil for the vertical stabilizer. What evidence are you
offering that this claim is bogus?

And this is what is holding up getting an extension on the SR-22? Tell me
how the G2 is preventing Cirrus from getting an extension on the SR-22.


Do they think that sales will be better for the G-2 if they get a
reputation for
misrepresenting the SR-22?

I think your claims of being a pilot are bogus.

You are an idiot.