View Single Post
  #88  
Old May 15th 04, 03:15 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

Then you aren't paying attention to what you're reading, then.


I understand them completely.



No, the significant thing is that it requires a craft that can carry a
payload of a few hundred extra pounds, along with the capability of
flying without major refurbishment. This has not been done before.


No? What was the payload capacity of the X-15?



You said you read the rules - why don't you know this, then?


What is it you think I don't know?



Except for the whole "carry a payload and be reusable without a long
turnaround time" bit.


The X-15 carried a payload and was reusable without a long turnaround time.