View Single Post
  #2  
Old June 11th 04, 06:12 PM
G Farris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
says...

In article , Peter Duniho wrote:
Do you still maintain that TFRs being published implies that there is no
plan to eliminate them?


Personally, I don't know - but I think they should quit pussyfooting
around and either get rid of the TFRs or change them to
restricted/prohibited areas.


I disagree. as long as they remain temporary, they can easily (and quietly) be
removed. Some wounds take time to heal. 911 was a big wound to the country,
and authorities have to show they are doing something - even if it's
sometimes more show than substance. If the TFR's can be removed in time, so
much the better. I don't really know what "freedom" we will have gained by
being able to fly over a nuclear power station, but the Presidential TFR
guessing game is tiresome, and the TFR's in general present a regulatory trap
for pilots - so it would be better if they could be lifted in time. So what if
it takes another three years - better than never, don't you agree?

G Faris