Martin

1. Had not seen before.

2. Was presented as new news.

3. Sorry to rehash old news.

Big John
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:04:11 GMT, Martin Hotze
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:44:06 -0500, Big John wrote:

Not on thread but let me add the following to this post vs opening a
new thread.

Saw yesterday on the 'Telly' that analysis of the WTC buildings
collapses was not caused by the aircraft impact or the fuel on the
aircraft.

The ensuing fires were fueled by the mountains of paper work and plush
furnishings in the offices that burned and softened the steel beams to
where they collapsed. The fuel all burned in a minute or two according
the report and stucture held. From report, I got the idea that office
furnishings in the future in WTC type of tall buildings would have
restrictions on flammability.

If this it true does any one think that TSA will take these facts into
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
account and remove some of the existing draconian rules they have????


Well, this story is now more than one year old. At least here (Europe) we
had TV documentations with interviews of the architect (his office) of the
WTC, tests in labs, etc.

So yes, it is true and it is old news, at least here.

Big John

#m