View Single Post
  #17  
Old June 24th 04, 07:39 PM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:14:59 -0700, Tom Sixkiller wrote:


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
I think Deakin is worth reading, but some of what he says should be taken
with a grain of salt. His columns are mostly based on experiments with his
own highly modified Bonanza, a few high performance radial engines, and

some
theory. In fact, a careful reading of his columns will show no test data

for
the most common engine and propeller combinations in use today.


You've not read hiscolumns about the test beds they've run at GAMI?


The reasons
for this are fairly simple -- few airplanes have the instrumentation that
Deakin needs to test his theories. This is why Deakin's theories for

running
lean of peak remain a minority view. Granted, it is a very noisy minority,
but remember that it is also a small minority. I think they have a point.
They may even be right. But they don't have nearly the evidence that they
think they have.


See above.

Deakin's remarks are mostly pertinent to running TCM engines, which are

much
different than engines from other manufacturers.


I bellieve they run Lycoming on the test bed as well, everything from
pipsqueaks to the big 540's.

Not to put too fine a point
on it, some TCM engines are the only ones I know of that so consistently
develop cracks that the most part of an annual inspection basically

consists
of measuring and cataloging the spread of these cracks. The engine used in
the early 70's Cessna T206 rarely made it to its 1400 hour TBO, for

example.

Barring solid data to the contrary (and Deakin, remember, does not give

you
solid data -- he only appears to do that), your airplane should be

operated
in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. This will ensure

that
you maintain your insurance coverage, if nothing else.


I think GAMI generated enough data on their stand to run a computer dry.

http://www.engineteststand.com/


Is the data offered in the articles you refer to or is it available on
the web site? It does not appear to be jumping out at me. I see a couple
of pictures of some graphs, a webring link, and email address, and a link
to gami.com. What am I missing?

Thanks,

Greg