On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:09:50 -0700, C J Campbell wrote:
Still, there's a third alternative: safe computing.
Again, safe for whom? Apparently the high priests are concerned only for
their own safety, ie, jobs.
Actually, it's the "high priests" which are trying to hold the line
against safe computing because it's a very high, steep, and sliperly
slope. It's the general public and CTO-Q-public which seems to be pushing
the line for that.
Greg
|