kontiki wrote:

The board will convene once every 90 days to
consider any pending lawsuits.

Would this be enough to catch a lawsuit against a vacuum pump company for a
crash where the vacuum pump worked? Evidence would need to be presented as
to why the company was included in the action, and evidence would need to
be presented that the pump was (or was not) working.

I like the direction you're taking, but I think it would involve more
time/work that you've envisioned.

However: keep in mind that a jury awarded monies in the case where the
non-failed vacuum pump was involved. Why would the pre-jury you've
designed be any less foolish?

- Andrew