gatt wrote:


not yet found evidence. So I guess the HIJACK DISTRESS SIGNAL
(http://www.cnn.com) isn't "evidence," yeah?

I remember something in some of my flight training material
that said be carefull of the sequence you use to set transponder
codes. The wrong sequence can inadvertently set off one of the
emergency codes.


Oh, yeah...one more bit of evidence they don't have: "witnesses heard
explosions associated with the planes going down." Same story. But
wait...there's mo
"Other witnesses told Interfax they saw the plane explode before it
crashed." No evidence there either.

Evidence of what? All I see here, at most, is that there are
indications of an explosion. I don't see anything here that indicates
those explosions have to be tied to terrorists.

Rich Lemert