"Corky Scott" wrote in message
No one is claiming there were no crashes, they're just saying wait a bit
for the evidence that the crashes were due to explosions.
They are? Where? Quote, please.
As to the WTC, again k'mon. You know as well as everyone else that
the eye witness reports were backed up by extraordinary video footage
of the airplanes smacking into the buildings and exploding in a huge
fireball.
Yeah, but other than the few million witnesses, what did the NTSB really
have for proof that it was terrorism? Sounds like a ludicrous question,
huh? Kinda like arguing that there's no evidence that the two Russian jets
that crashed didn't explode, given, you know, all the witnesses saying they
exploded.
Forgive me for not being a Russian bureaucrat. I'm just not good at that
sort of thing.
-c
|