"Tony Cox" wrote in message
ink.net...
Whether or not I harangue him for using improper phraseology it's still
improper phraseology. Please restate your question using examples with
proper phraseology.

Well, that would be a different question, now wouldn't it?

How can you argue to change standard phraseology, and yet and the same time
postulate a person not using standard phraseology for the purpose of
defending your position?