View Single Post
  #137  
Old September 3rd 04, 04:03 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Peter
Gottlieb" wrote:

Ok, let me give it a try:

Republicans -
Social - Conservative rhetoric, hypocritical execution. No
limits
to gov't control.


to the contrary, the limits to the government are spelled out
in the constitution.


Economics - Maximize wealth at top (trickle-down theory). Works
well for top, worse for others.


Maximize wealth at top isn't the Republican thing. Republicans
want people to retain more of their earnings. That is, money
doesn't belong to the government

And "maximize wealth at top" trickle down


[snip]

Democrats -
Social - Less government involvement. More volatility.


if you want to claim Conservative rhetoric above, then add
Liberal rhetoric with hypocritical execution to the democrats



Economics - More spread of wealth. Unclear how to execute this
properly, very mixed record.


unclear by "more spread of wealth" and wouldn't "take from haves and
give to have-nots" be more accurate?

--
Bob Noel
Seen on Kerry's campaign airplane: "the real deal"
oh yeah baby.