"Tom Fleischman" wrote in
message rthlink.net

I have never exchanged word one with you before today, so why do you
feel it necessary to begin your discussion with me by being insulting.
It is so typical of right-wingers to think that it is appropriate to
behave this way.

Oh, *that* is rich. You've been flinging names and personal insults
throughout this thread and we're suddenly supposed to see you as holding the
moral high ground? Puh-lease.

BTW, I think you need to stop regurgitating the liberal attack weenies'
one-liners and actually look up the definition of "neoconservative". You
keep bandying that term around like it's some sort of insult, but it only
shows your lack of understanding. I'm curious why you'd apply it to people
who've demonstrated long-standing convervative viewpoints.

Typical of most liberal "attack dogs" I've come across. Only the
"right-wing nutjobs" are the brainwashed repeating political talking points.
Tom, you'd have a lot more credibility if you'd demonstrate some of your own
critical thinking you claim is not shown by those who don't agree with you.

--
Bob