"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
[...] I
submit that a National Guardsman attempting to intimidate people by taking
their picture would be "offensive to a reasonable person."

Whether it would or not is irrelevant, as the pictures were not taken "under
circumstances in which the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of
privacy".

[...]
New York itself has a right of privacy law which prohibits intrusion of a
"reasonable expectation of privacy." A National Guardsman attempting to
intimidate law abiding citizens clearly falls into this category.

How does intimidation create a violation of privacy? It doesn't.

Pete