Jay Honeck wrote:

What you describe may not be a chemically induced impairment, but
possibly a speech impediment or psychological condition.


You know, I honestly hadn't considered that.

He sure sounded impaired to us -- and the non-standard radio terminology was
certainly peculiar -- but what the heck. I suppose he could just speak
differently than us.

Or, he was loaded.

I have to say that the notion of vigilanties flying around looking for
trouble bothers me tremendously. MYOB.