Mark Oliver wrote:

The current theory of flight is based upon the Bernoulli's Principal, the

No it's not!
Do not stress old Bernoulli. His findings are restricted to the flowing
media only. You can use the _some_ of his laws to find the forces caused by
the air on the structure of the airplane.
In fact the "real" cause for an airplane to stay up is inertia and friction
of the air.
Please see some new publications on aerodynamics (past 1980') to get an idea
on how that works. (You might want to dust of Your knowledge about
differential equations.)


THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current
theory of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to
normal
level flight. However, we know and observe that inverted flight is

Once again if You want to find what the moving air is doing Bernoulli is
fine. And if You do some experimenting, like I did, You will find there is
no dependence from the direction.


The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational
Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Utilizing Newton's laws that equal
opposite force is generated at right angles, be it applied at once or

What Newton was that? Can You cite any document from Mister Newton?


2) As you extend spoilers and flaps at the leading and trailing edges, the
bottom of the wing now becomes "cupped" like a satellite dish, and able to
capture more Gravitational Vector Force, creating more lift


The paragraph above says that a prop can not produce any thrust when heading
straight down? I haven't ever done that but I guess some of the Aerobatics
guys around here can prove You wrong on this point.


And one last statement: There is no "Universal Balance" anywhere (like there
is no "Earth in the Balance"). There is either Stability or Transformation.
Prove me wrong on _that_ if You can!

I keep flying with my old friend Bernoulli and his brother until then....
--

Remove the cork to Reply by e-Mail.