On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:05:31 -0700, "David Brooks"
wrote:

"Roger" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:44:39 -0700, "David Brooks"
wrote:

"Michael" wrote in message
. com...
Today is October 19, and...

a *great* summary of the TSA IFR, but:

snip

The Category 3 rule says "A flight school may not provide training... to
a
*candidate*... unless...".

The Category 4 rule (which covers BFRs) says "Prior to beginning
recurrent
training for a *candidate*..."


Not sure I understand that. A BFR is not recurrent training.
It is a flight review.

The Definitions section of the Rule says, in pertinent part, "Recurrent
training means periodic training required under 14 CFR part 61, 121,125,
135, or Subpart K of part 91", and that phrase embraces the Flight Review.

The way I read it and the way it was defined today it specifically
excludes BFRs.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
The definition completely undermines the discussion of the term in the
preamble. On the 20th, the TSA decided by fiat that they didn't mean it
(basically, they reaffirmed the definition in the discussion section).

-- David Brooks
Believe!!!!!