NoPoliticsHere wrote:
What you have done here is begun with a supposition (women are
hired on
the basis of political correctness and not competence) and then
worked
backwards in order support that supposition.

No, what I have done is claim that ***SOME*** women and minorities
are hired
when their gender and/or race takes on more importance than their
competence.
It is hard to believe that you *still* miss my point.

Claim=supposition. Shall I drag out Webster's?

And perhaps you could improve your reading comprehension.

See above. And don't bother with law school- you'd never pass the LSAT.