In article , B2431 says...
Got more interesting and useful things to do, John. Besides, Chuck has
never been interested in the truth, that's why he's still mouthing off
about ducks and hoots and other assorted BS. It's actually a pitiful
sight -- a grown man, reduced to inane whining on Usenet while the rest of
the world continues to revolve, just not around him.

In other words you have no proof.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Exactly right Dan .Right now there are two of us who know the truth, me and
jaun.
One of us is lying ,I can't prove a negative but he can prove (If he's telling
the truth) that I lost my kids in a custody trial it would be a matter of public
record.It would be simple to post that document. I know what and who he's
talking about ,same last name no relation. Same as if I would say that his kid
was fathered by a different man and offered no proof or said that because there
is another Jiminiz out there it must be his family. Sheesh what a joke and he
talks about credibility ,especially when he works for the least credible
publication out there.

See ya

Chuck RAH-15/1 ret